Rozin for the reply and dialogue will be encouraged, but not expected. An entire package of materials will be provided to Mr. This will be a very tight and thorough peer review. and the author will grade the work with the EP and MAMA scoring systems. Rozin’s work dealing with cosmology will be peer-reviewed by the author and GPT-4 (and it will do the AIM and evidence grading) The sections of his work dealing with philosophy will be summarized by GPT-4 for meaning, definition, etc. Therefore this peer review will be handled fairly this way: The sections of Mr. Rozin, who is simply ignorant of certain cosmological frameworks and has merely made a natural mistake in several assumptions. However, it would not be fair to use a highly engineered philosophy system to “jump” Mr. Rozin’s short treatise deserved an EPEMC-style peer review. Upon a more thorough review than the summaries written by GPT-4, it became clear to the author that Mr. Ellis’ work by hand and came across the work of V. However, due to paywalls the author went looking for Mr. If it isn’t, are other philosophies that are engineered or pre-engineered novel, or presenting novel and pragmatic P7 (at a minimum) solutions, and are they concerned with a) ethics and morality, b) good for humanity, and c) good for the planet? In the results, the Standford Encyclopedia entry came up, as well as G. ABSTRACT In this paper, the author reviews his search to test the idea that MIMS (Membranous Interface of Material & Spiritual) theory and the philosophy are unique, novel, and primary in the engineering (futurization) of a futurizing, cosmology, highly empirical philosophaether.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |